<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Search Experiments blog &#187; spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.search-experiments.com/blog/tag/spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.search-experiments.com/blog</link>
	<description>Explaining and recording details of the SEO experiments on this site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 20:19:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Causality, splogging and speculation</title>
		<link>http://www.search-experiments.com/blog/2008/10/09/causality-splogging-and-speculation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.search-experiments.com/blog/2008/10/09/causality-splogging-and-speculation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>henrypuk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO experiments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[causality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[splogging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.search-experiments.com/blog/?p=77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a common issue for anyone involved in SEO or Google-watching, and I suppose in many other areas as well.
You take an action X. Event Y follows. You can build a plausible hypothesis for a connection between X and Y. X therefore caused Y.
The SEO version of this goes: you released new feature/code tweak/section [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a common issue for anyone involved in SEO or Google-watching, and I suppose in many other areas as well.</p>
<p>You take an action X. Event Y follows. You can build a plausible hypothesis for a connection between X and Y. X therefore caused Y.</p>
<p>The SEO version of this goes: you released new feature/code tweak/section on your website. Traffic went up the following week. New feature was a success! </p>
<p>My latest version of this runs as follows: I experimented with some splogging on another blog (the relationship with this one is not disguised: they are cross-linked and hosted on the same account). I created a number of automatic posts using RSS-generated content about Google, ensuring that every time the word &#8220;search&#8221; appeared in the posts, it linked to the home page of this site. Before I did this, the home page of this site was #5 or #6 on Google, which it had been for a while. Today it is #20. So it might be very easy to jump to the conclusion that Google has spotted my nefarious tactics, and has penalised my site. </p>
<p>Is that a reasonable conclusion based on the evidence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.search-experiments.com/blog/2008/10/09/causality-splogging-and-speculation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

